Article preview reprinted from IN VIVO - February 2009
Not satisfied with its R&D experiments to date, GSK has taken its most radical step yet toward re-creating biotech within its walls: even smaller units complete with investment boards occupied by external VCs and CEOs and milestone-based funding and external VCs.
GSK Tries to Mimic Real-World Biotech
Article preview reprinted from IN VIVO - February 2009
When GlaxoSmithKline PLC first announced its Centers of Excellence for Drug Discovery (CEDD) structure post-merger in 2000, the idea was to break down huge corporate line-function R&D into more focused, and hence productive, units. Each spanned discovery to proof-of-concept in a particular therapeutic area (or areas); each had about 300 to 400 scientists and they competed with each other for company funds.
That was seen as pretty radical at the time. But nine years on, after several iterations and additions, including a biologics CEDD and a partnering-only unit known as the Center of Excellence for External Drug Discovery (CEEDD), it's clear that CEDDs version 1.0, as it might be called, failed to address the R&D productivity problem. (See "R&D Productivity at GSK? He CEDD, She CEDD," In Vivo Europe Rx, January 2004 and "GSK's Risk-Sharing Deals to Compete with In-House R&D," IN VIVO, March 2006.) GSK's late-stage pipeline appears woefully inadequate in the face of patent expiries--most notably, that of COPD and asthma treatment fluticasone/salmeterol (Advair).
Hence GSK's management, under new-ish CEO Andrew Witty, introduced the latest, and most radical, change within GSK R&D one that takes this Big Pharma as close as is arguably possible to mimicking real-world biotech within its walls. First of all, the unit-size got smaller, with the creation, announced in mid-2008, of two dozen or so pathway-focused drug performance units (DPUs), each with just about 50 scientists. Most of these sit within the CEDDs (with a couple of stand-alone exceptions), and as for the CEDDs themselves, the buzzwords are ownership, accountability, and efficiency.
Purchase this article online as a PDF and receive it immediately via email. Questions? Call (800) 332-2181. 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed. Subscribe to IN VIVO.
Companies mentioned in this article:
Amgen Inc.
Archemix Corp.
Ardea Biosciences Inc.
AstraZeneca PLC
Biotica Technology Ltd.
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.
Cellzome AG
ChemoCentryx Inc.
Dynavax Technologies Corp.
Exelixis Inc.
Galapagos NV
Genmab AS
GlaxoSmithKline PLC
Genelabs Technologies Inc.
Sirtris Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Merck & Co. Inc.
NeuroSearch AS
Novartis AG
Novartis Pharma AG
Idenix Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Oncomed Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Pfizer Inc.
Coley Pharmaceutical Group Inc.
Regulus Therapeutics LLC
Roche
Sanofi-Aventis
Schering-Plough Corp.
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.
Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Theravance Inc.
Wyeth
IN VIVO delivers:
- Revealing, in-depth coverage of your competitors' strategies
- Incisive projections of future industry trends and their implications for your business
- Expert analysis of key industry developments
- Exclusive interviews with top industry executives and analysts
- In-depth examination of dealmaking, marketing, R&D, regulatory, and finance strategies -- those that were successful and those that missed the mark
- Subscribe to IN VIVO today!




