Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Subscribe in Bloglines

Notices

  • Copyright©2008-2009, F-D-C Reports, Inc. and Windhover Information Inc. All rights reserved.

« Covidien buys Vnus Medical Technologies for $470mm cash | Main | Medtronic Gets FDA Approval For Pair Of Brain Stimulators »

May 26, 2009

513(g) Device Classification Requests Drop; FDA Plans Guidance

Full article reprinted from "The Gray Sheet" - May 25, 2009

FDA's device center has seen a big drop-off in 513(g) requests since a new user fee put a hefty price tag on the voluntary product classification queries. Find out more...

513(g) Device Classification Requests Drop; FDA Plans Guidance
 
Full article reprinted from "The Gray Sheet" - May 25, 2009

FDA's device center has seen a big drop-off in 513(g) requests since a new user fee put a hefty price tag on the voluntary product classification queries.

Before the user fee went into effect in fiscal year 2008, 513(g) filings had been increasing steadily - from four in 1990 to 364 in 2007. Firms saw the free requests as a way to find out whether a device was exempt from 510(k) requirements without paying 510(k) or PMA user fees, the agency says.

Since 2007, FDA has seen a 70% drop-off in the voluntary filings. Only 111 requests were received in 2008, some of which may not have been reviewed due to lack of payment, 513(g) coordinator Diane Garcia says.

The standard user fee for 513(g) requests is $2,710 in FY 2009; the standard 510(k) fee, by comparison, is $3,693.

Industry Unwilling To Pay Double

Section 513(g) of the Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act lets companies formally request FDA's opinion on the likely classification of a device, and receive a written response within about 60 days.

Most companies use the filings to inquire whether a product is an FDA-regulated device; whether it is exempt from 510(k) requirements; whether a new 510(k) is needed for a device modification; or what the best regulatory route is for a new technology or a new intended use, according to FDA.

If FDA says the product seems to require a 510(k) or PMA, the company will end up paying twice.

"It appears that industry is not willing to pay two user fees to get the classification for a specific device type," noted Lawrence Romanell, an FDA health scientist and leader of the CDRH Matrix network for regulatory affairs and special interests.

Most often, and particularly for 513(g) requests related to software products, the agency determines that the device is not exempt and a 510(k) should be submitted, Romanell explained in a CDRH Web presentation on the 513(g) process.

"The Gray Sheet" gives you 51 issues per year filled with useful articles that will help you meet your business and regulatory objectives. Sign up for your 30-day, risk-free trial of "The Gray Sheet" today.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83452f00669e2011570a80db1970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 513(g) Device Classification Requests Drop; FDA Plans Guidance :

Search Medical Devices Today


  • medicaldevicestoday.com

Medical Device Advertisements

Device Industry Announcements